top of page

When the Tape Talks Back: Reading a Week of Mixed Signals

Aug 28
4 min read

What the Anchors Said All Week


The Gunslinger boards ran twelve reads from Thursday August 20 through Friday August 28. That is a full week of directional positioning across NQ, ES, GC, and CL, and the picture was not clean. It rarely is. The whole point of reviewing the week honestly is to show you what structured reading looks like when conditions cooperate and what it looks like when they do not.


NQ opened the stretch armed long toward 29,300 on the Thursday morning board, flipped short that same afternoon toward 29,300, came back long toward 29,500 Friday morning, then spent the bulk of the following week oscillating between 29,150 and 29,650. The final read Friday August 28 had NQ armed long toward 29,650. The tape closed at 29,509.5, with a day high of 29,811.5. That high touched above the anchor target, which means the level was in play even on a down day that finished 186.25 points lower than the prior close. ES ran a similar story, armed long toward 7,750 on the final morning board, closing at 7,724.75 after tagging 7,782.5 intraday. GC was armed short toward 4,650 on that same Friday morning read and closed at 4,504.1 after printing a high of 4,688. CL armed long toward 83.00, closed at 83.44, and hit a high of 83.78.


Where the Anchors Paid


Start with what worked, then deal with what did not.


CL was the cleanest instrument this week. The boards called long toward 82.00 Monday afternoon, long toward 80.50 Monday morning before that, and the tape spent the week pushing into the low-to-mid 83 range before settling Friday at 83.44. If you were trading toward the anchor and respecting the flat-in-the-middle rule on the sessions where CL had no directional arm, you had a workable setup with clear structure. The Friday close at 83.44 essentially landed on the 83.00 anchor called in the morning read. That is the kind of precision that makes structured reading worth the discipline.


GC short calls stacked through most of the week. The boards had gold armed short toward 4,710 on Monday morning and afternoon, short toward 4,690 Tuesday morning, flat midpoint Tuesday afternoon, short toward 4,680 Wednesday morning, then long toward 4,650 Wednesday afternoon, and back to short toward 4,650 Thursday afternoon and Friday morning. The tape confirmed: GC closed at 4,504.1, down 159.9 on the day and well below every short anchor cited during the week. The directional bias in gold was correct across multiple sessions, and traders who stayed with the read and traded toward the anchor without chasing had levels that held meaning.


ES produced mixed but partially usable structure. The long toward 7,725 read on Thursday morning resolved cleanly when the tape tagged 7,782.5 on Friday before reversing. The Friday morning long toward 7,750 did not fully resolve since the close came in at 7,724.75, but the intraday high touched above 7,750, so the level was reached before sellers stepped in.


Where the Anchors Did Not Pay


NQ was the frustrating instrument this week, and that needs to be stated plainly. The boards flipped NQ from long to short to long repeatedly across the ten days. Monday morning armed short toward 29,200. Monday afternoon reversed to long toward 29,150. Tuesday morning long toward 29,400, Tuesday afternoon short toward 29,200 on ES while NQ went flat. The chop in NQ meant that any trader holding positions past the initial move was getting squeezed by reversals. Friday's close at 29,509.5, down 186.25 on the day despite a high of 29,811.5, tells the story. The tape got to within reach of the 29,650 long anchor intraday and then sold off sharply. If you were not flat by midday you gave back the morning's work. The rule is trade toward the anchor and be flat in the middle. NQ this week was a week where that rule protected you from the worst damage, but it also meant there were sessions where the setup never delivered a clean entry-to-anchor run.


The Thursday afternoon ES short toward 7,725 also deserves mention. The close Friday was 7,724.75, which is essentially the target, but the path there ran through a day high of 7,782.5, meaning if you were short from Thursday afternoon the tape first ran against you before eventually coming back. That is a test of discipline, not a clean read.


The Pattern Worth Carrying Into Next Week


Two things stand out. First, CL respected its levels better than any other instrument this week. When CL had a directional arm, the tape moved toward that anchor with enough consistency to be tradable. When CL was flat at the midpoint, it was genuinely flat. That is the signal. Watch whether CL continues to honor structure next week. Second, GC showed a sustained directional bias short that played out over multiple sessions. The boards were not always consistent on the exact anchor number, but the direction held. In a week where NQ was churning, gold gave traders something to work with.


NQ needs to clarify. The tape is capable of large range days, as Friday's 374-point spread between high and low demonstrates, but without anchor-to-anchor follow-through, it is a chop grinder. Wait for NQ to commit before sizing in.


What Is Set Up for Monday


Heading into Monday August 31, the Friday morning board had NQ armed long toward 29,650 and the tape closed at 29,509.5. That is roughly 140 points of unfinished business to the upside anchor. ES closed at 7,724.75 with a long arm toward 7,750 still in play. GC closed at 4,504.1 well below the 4,650 short anchor, which means MOJO CODE™ will need a fresh read to establish whether new structure sets up or whether the instrument is now extended enough to shift the arm. CL closed at 83.44 within range of last week's anchor territory.


The boards post fresh every session. Read them before the open, trade toward the anchor, and stay flat in the middle. That is the discipline MOJO CODE™ is built on, and it is the only edge the structure offers.


New to futures? The beginners course starts where the anchor does:



MOJO CODE™ is a proprietary trading indicator system. Educational content only, not financial advice. Trading futures involves substantial risk of loss.


Keep it profitable,

ProTrader Mike

 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page